“A Steeper Hill to Climb”: The Role and Experience of Student Trustees in Public Higher Education Governing Boards
Abstract
The limited literature on student trusteeship leaves many unanswered questions regarding the role, expe-rience, and impact of those within the governance of higher education. To counter the scant research in this area, the authors offer a background for understanding the role and experience of student trustees of public higher education institutions in the U.S. The authors use Bandura‘s (1986) Social Cognitive Theory to expose and highlight how student trustees experience and navigate their roles on the board. Interviews with 30 student trustees from 26 public boards in 21 states indicate that student trustees have unique board experiences influenced by (1) their identities as both student and trustee, (2) their limited terms and repre-sentation on the board, (3) their explicit and/or implicit attachment to the student constituency, and (4) their relative inexperience in life, education, and employment in comparison with their laymen peers. Find-ings have implications for how student trustees are viewed and incorporated on the board in a time when the leadership and ethics of higher education have been called into question.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jppg.v8n2a2
Abstract
The limited literature on student trusteeship leaves many unanswered questions regarding the role, expe-rience, and impact of those within the governance of higher education. To counter the scant research in this area, the authors offer a background for understanding the role and experience of student trustees of public higher education institutions in the U.S. The authors use Bandura‘s (1986) Social Cognitive Theory to expose and highlight how student trustees experience and navigate their roles on the board. Interviews with 30 student trustees from 26 public boards in 21 states indicate that student trustees have unique board experiences influenced by (1) their identities as both student and trustee, (2) their limited terms and repre-sentation on the board, (3) their explicit and/or implicit attachment to the student constituency, and (4) their relative inexperience in life, education, and employment in comparison with their laymen peers. Find-ings have implications for how student trustees are viewed and incorporated on the board in a time when the leadership and ethics of higher education have been called into question.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jppg.v8n2a2
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
Today | 38 |
Yesterday | 72 |
This Month | 158 |
Last Month | 2961 |
All Days | 932251 |
Online | 3 |